I went to the David Weekly Homes design center yesterday watching their model home. By the way, the floor plan was beautiful. If you live in Austin and require design ideas, you have to visit their design center and tour the model home. It's one of the greatest floor plans I've ever seen for families. Anyway, their marketing material has some appealing inscriptions with regard to design vs. square footage. It states, "Innovative design isn't considered in square feet or on a calculator. It's measured in cubic feet and light and the way a room feels when you go into it. The design bumps up the worth of your home like no other factor can. Exceptional design is not only an art but all those traffic designs, room position, and sight lines are a science too ." The catalog carries on with "Two homes have the same square footage yet one looks much bigger than the other. Why? Sight lines are responsible for the difference. Sight lines refer to any given point that you view in the home from dissimilar vantages. As you move through a home, it's far more appealing to get a preview of what's to come with subtle ideas of the places beyond than to be cut off from the remaining of the home--which is why a David Weekly Home appears and lives bigger compared from all the remaining." Sounds pretty good, and I have the same opinion. In fact, I've stated this out in previous articles with regard to why some older homes, with uneven, boxy, layouts do not compete well against smaller, newer homes with improved floor plans. These "sight lines" and design factors help clarify why the home that I recently wrote about which was smaller than 1800 square feet at first looked to be more than 2100 square feet, as the MLS listing pointed out (see the blog post prior to this one for the full story). That home got a layout that is graceful and open, thus looking bigger than it really is. What Weekly indicated about flow and design was what the argument of the owner and agent is all about concerning the square foot deficiency. But here's the kicker, if you visit to the David Weekly website to look for floor plans, what do you have in mind the next query asked is--after you choose your city? That query is the preferred square footage. I assume that the resources of Weekly are vast for determining real estate customers' buying manner, that is why they knew square footage to be the top initial exploration found on their website, but all that concerning design being more essential than size is right also . Some individuals do give importance to square footage over design, otherwise KB Homes would not have sold the number of big, boxy cheap 3,000+ sqft homes that they have built all over the country. Others do prefer design elements, otherwise small high-end condos with 1100 square feet would never trade for the price per square foot that they do. For some of course, location trumps the whole thing. But no matter what the main appealing factor, individuals will always still ask regarding the home, at some point, "what is the square footage," and they will reason out the answer into their buying decision.
Article Source: http://www.articlecontentprovider.com/articlesubmit
I went to the David Weekly Homes design center yesterday watching their model home. By the way, the floor plan was beautiful. If you live in Austin and require design ideas, you have to visit their design center and tour the model home. It's one of the greatest floor plans I've ever seen for families.
This article was created by Chandler Smith, a young and bright real estate expert in the Austin area. He maintains Austin Home Appraisals as well as Austin Real Estate Appraisals
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 5 4 out of 5 3 out of 5 2 out of 5 1 out of 5
