There are an ever increasing number of new regulations that are hitting the pest control industry, and some industry experts believe that these new government rules may add $145 million to the yearly cost of controlling powder post beetles. Referencing industry standard figures to back up the argument that efficient substitutes exist which may be adopted that would require little to no increase in expenses, the Environmental Protection Agency rejects such claims. Pest control companies are just as quick to dispute the EPA's claims, though, as the vice president of a local pest control company said that removing the popular pesticide from the market will make it more expensive to treat homes for the beetle. Infesting an estimated 140,000 American houses per year, this insect is in many regards similar to the termite. The product that was banned used to be the most reliable product on the market, and it only required that it be sprayed one time a year to guarantee the homeowner that the beetles were gone. He says there was nothing dangerous about the chemical and that it was highly effective, but now that it is banned they have no choice but to use total fumigation. People now have to leave their houses while the gas is sprayed and wait for it to be gone to return. Rather than simply paying a small amount of money charged for the typical chemical application, most homeowners with this pest now have to come out of pocket about $1,000 to $2,000. The EPA seems unwilling to concede the point, though, and says that there is another chemical available that should work about as well as the previous treatment for a similar cost. The spokesman was also quick to point out that the threat of the powder post beetle is questionable since it can only cause aesthetic damage. Known as pentachlorophenol, this chemical does turn out to be almost identical in regards to the price of the banned chemical; this replacement utilized to control the powder post beetle was approved by the EPA and is efficient. The end result is that the American homeowner can relax, knowing that there will not be a substantial rise in the price of the necessary pesticide. As the EPA spokesman pointed out, this analysis was based on the testimony given by the pest control association as well as the producer of the now banned pesticide. The source of the testimony was a set of hearings conducted by the EPA about potentially halting use of the chemical and whether or not to outright ban it. If the EPA's cost control figures prove to be unrealistic, it will mean that consumers will be asked to pony up millions of extra dollars every year to fight powder post beetles. The owner of a pest control company claims that his company has safely and effectively used the banned chemical for over 30 years with no problems, and he is now disgusted that his only option is to explain to his customer that if they want protection they will have to pay $1000 or more to have their home fumigated. The EPA based its decision on information which was incomplete, he also claims. The EPA has yet to reverse the decision which the company owner claims was obviously a mistake, and it may take several more years for the public hearings to finally come to an end.
Article Source: http://www.articlecontentprovider.com/articlesubmit
One of the most common household pests is the powder post beetle and new government regulations mean that Americans may be spending an additional $145 million a year to eliminate it, according to one insecticide industry official. The Environmental Protection Agency denies these allegations claiming that even though they have outlawed a particularly popular chemical, there are still several other options that are just as effective and cost the same amount as well.
To get a closer look on pest Control Australia visit this site. Further information on local home pest control can be found there.
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 5 4 out of 5 3 out of 5 2 out of 5 1 out of 5
