Israeli Archaeologist Eliat Mazar is claiming excavations recently finished date back as far as 3,000 years. This lends credence to the view that the Bible is not only a nice story but an real happening. She states that the defenses protecting Jerusalem date as far back as King Solomon and illustrate that Jerusalem was a powerful city with a sturdy centralized ruling system. Mazar feels that the evidence exhibits that Jerusalem had resources and manpower required to put together such impressive defenses. But this item is disputed among many experts. Mazar believes that Hebrew Kings like David and Solomon ruled from Jerusalem in the 10th century B.C. There are other archaeologists who sustain the notion that the rule under King David was just a yarn and that there was not a strong government during that era. Mazar held a press conference courtesy of the University of Jerusalem and stated that her discovery is the "most momentous construction we have from First Temple days in Israel." She thinks that Solomon, King David’s son, constructed the strongholds surrounding the city. These are the structures just excavated. She considers that this is the actual structure spoken of in the Book of Kings in the Bible. She also feels certain that this wall exhibits the force of a centralized rule because of the requirements a structure of that size would necessitate. The fortifications included a gatehouse and a long portion of wall that's approximately 70 meters in length and is situated right outside the current dividers marking Jerusalem's Old City. The fortifications are also near the Noble Sanctuary. The Old Testament affirms that Solomon erected the original Jewish Temple at this spot, but the temple was subsequently toppled by the Babylonians; then rebuilt and renovated courtesy of King Herod approximately two thousand years ago. But after that the Romans destroyed it in 70 A.D., so the question remains if such a large piece could really be found. At present, the compound houses a pair of crucial Islamic structures - the Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa mosque. It is not that Mazar was the first archaeologist to unearth the wall. It was unearthed starting in the 1860s and again in the 1980s. However, she asserts that her dig was the very first comprehensive excavation and that it was the one to demonstrate strong evidence for the wall's antiquity. Pieces of crockery were observed along the wall and helped Mazar determine the wall's approximate age. But Mazars assertions, as noted earlier, are regarded with disapproval. Aren Maeir, an archaeology professor from Bar Ilan University, requires that he be able to see the proof that the walls are as ancient as Mazar declares. He holds that there are ruins as far back as the 10th century in Jerusalem but declarations that this ancient city was the hub of a formidable centralized kingdom are a bit of a stretch. While some archaeologists believe that the story of King David and Solomon is but a tale, there are others who trust it is strictly fact. And so the debate rages on.
Article Source: http://www.articlecontentprovider.com/articlesubmit
Israeli Archaeologist Eliat Mazar is asserting that renovations newly conducted date back 3,000 years. This offers credence to the view that the Holy Bible is not merely a compelling but an genuine happening. She declares that the fortifications surrounding Jerusalem date as far back as King Solomon and demonstrate that Jerusalem was a strong city with a cohesive local ruling system. Mazar believes that the evidence exhibits that Jerusalem had resources and manpower needed to assemble the ...
This article was written and distributed by ClassesandCareers.com, a leader in online education. Start your career off on the right foot with a degree by accredited Online Schooling. If you are looking for a specific Adult Education Course, our website can help you get started.
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 5 4 out of 5 3 out of 5 2 out of 5 1 out of 5
